The following sources have been used in producing this document:
Ante, Spencer E. “After Verdict, Prepare for the ‘Apple Tax’” The Wall Street Journal. N.p. 24 August. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444270404577610013613551038.html>
Apple Inc. United States. Registration No. 3,457,218. Filed 12 October 2007.
<http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77303049&docId=ORC20080729005406>
Apple Inc. United States. Registration No. 3,470,983. Filed 12 October 2007.
<http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77303282&docId=ORC20080722005613>.
Apple Inc. United States. Registration No. 3,475,327. Filed 12 October 2007.
<http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77303256&docId=ORC20080701005034>.
APPLE COMPUTER, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. APPLE COMPUTER, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, and Hewlett-Packard Co., Defendant-Appellant. APPLE COMPUTER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; Hewlett-Packard Co., a California Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. 35 The Federal Reporter 1435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. N.d.Bulk.Resource.org. Web. 08 Oct. 2012.
<http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/35/35.F3d.1435.93-16883.93-16869.93-16867.html>.
Apple Inc., a California corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a Korean corporation; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York corporation; and Samsung Telecommunications America, Llc, a Delaware limited liability company. 12-CV- 00630-LHK. United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division. Filed 1 July 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2012. <http://osterbergblog.typepad.com/files/apple-samsungpivgalaxy-nexus.pdf>.
Apple Inc., a California corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a Korean corporation; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York corporation; and Samsung Telecommunications America, Llc, a Delaware limited liability company. 12-CV- 00630-LHK. United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division. Filed 31 August 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2012. <http://www.scribd.com/doc/104573859/Amended-Galaxy-Complaint>.
Arrouye, Yan, and Keith Mortensen. "Universal Interface for Retrieval of Information in a Computer System". Apple Inc. (Cupertino, CA), assignee. Patent 8,086,604. 27 Dec. 2011. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=8,086,604.PN.&OS=PN/8,086,604&RS=PN/8,086,604>
Arthur, Charles, and George Sandeman. "Samsung: Verdict Is 'loss for American Consumer'" CNET News. CBS Interactive, 23 Aug. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500261-37/samsung-verdict-is-loss-for-american- consumer/>.
Bartz, Diane, and Dan Levine. "U.S. Court Clears Samsung Phone, Hands Apple Setback."Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/11/us-apple-samsung-patent-idUSBRE89A11C20121011>.
Blagdon, Jeff. "The Verge." The Verge. N.p., 24 July 2012. Web. 07 Dec. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/24/3180781/apple-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1n-7-7-injunction-dusseldorf-germany>
Chartrand, Sabra. “At the Patent Office, a Digital Dawn.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 12 November 1994. Web. 6 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/12/business/at-the-patent-office-a-digital-dawn.html>
Chartrand, Sabra. “PATENTS; The patent office is fighting once again to hold onto its own revenue in the budget battle.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 19 June 2000. Web. 10 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06 /19/business/patents-patent-office-fighting-once-again-hold-onto-its-own-revenue-budget.html>
"Copyright vs. Trademark vs. Patent." Copyright vs. Trademark vs. Patent. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2012. <http://www.lawmart.com/forms/difference.htm>.
Davis, Shauna. Bickel, Ryan. "Display Screen with User Interface" Patent D640275. June 21 2011. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPT
O%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=11&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&p=1&S1=7,864,163&OS=7,864,163&RS=7,864,163>
Davidson, Phillip L. Graphical User Interface for Large-scale, Multi-user, Multi-touch Systems. Perceptive Pixel, Inc., assignee. Patent 8,181,122. 15 May 2012. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=8,181,122.PN.&OS=PN/8,181,122&RS=PN/8,181,122>
De La Merced, Michael J. “Yahoo and Facebook Settle Patent Lawsuits.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 6 July 2012. Web. 11 October 2012. <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/yahoo-and-facebook-said-to-settle-patent- lawsuits/>
Diaconescu, Adrian. "USPTO Invalidates Key Apple Patent, Samsung’s Defense Starts to Make Sense." Android Authority. N.p., 23 Oct. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.androidauthority.com/uspto-invalidates-key-apple-patent-samsung- war-125122/>.
Duhigg, Charles & Lohr, Steve. “The Patent, Used as a Sword.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 7 October 2012. Web. 9 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/technology/patent-wars-among-tech-giants-can-stifle-competition.html>
Etherington, Darrell. "U.S. Patent Office Preliminary Determination Finds That The âSteve Jobsâ Multitouch Patent Is Invalid." TechCrunch RSS. Aol Tech., 7 Dec. 2012. Web. 07 Dec. 2012.<http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/07/u-s-patent-office-preliminary-determination-finds-that-the-steve-jobs-multitouch-patent-is-invalid/>
Etherington, Darrell. "Apple Adds Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Mini And Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 To California Patent Lawsuit." TechCrunch. Aol Tech., 26 Nov. 2012. Web. 03 Dec. 2012. <http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/26/apple-adds-galaxy-note-ii-galaxy-s-iii-mini-and-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-to-california-patent-lawsuit/>
Etherington, Darrell. "Samsung Adds IPad Mini, 4th Generation IPad And 5th Generation IPod Touch To Patent Lawsuit." TechCrunch. AOL Tech, 22 Nov. 2012. Web. 03 Dec. 2012.<http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/22/samsung-adds-ipad-mini-4th-generation-ipad-and-5th-generation-ipod-touch-to-patent-lawsuit/>
Fisher, Lawrence M. “Software Industry in Uproar Over Recent Rush of Patents.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 12 May 1989. Web. 6 October 2012.<http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/12/business/software-industry-in-uproar-over-recent-rush-of-patents.html>
Freedman, Gordon J. "Asynchronous Data Synchronization amongst Devices." Apple Inc. (Cupertino, CA), assignee. Patent 7,761,414. 20 July 2010. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,761,414.PN.&OS=PN/7,761,414&RS=PN/7,761,414>
Gallagher, Billy. "Apple Awarded $1.049 Billion In Damages As Jury Finds Samsung Infringed On Design And Software Patents." TechCrunch. AOL Tech., 24 Aug. 2012. Web. 11 Oct. 2012. <http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/24/apple-wins-patent- ruling-as-jury-finds-samsung-infringes/>.
"General Information Concerning Patents." General Information Concerning Patents. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Nov. 2012. <http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/general_info_concerning_patents.jsp>.
Goodwin, Richard. "The Complete Guide to Why Apple Is Sueing Samsung." Know Your Mobile. Dennis Publishing 2012, 7 Sept. 2011. Web. 1 Nov. 2012. <http://www.knowyourmobile.com/features/1045462 /the_complete_guide_to_why_apple_is_sueing_samsung.html>.
Handelman, Jeffery A. "Stretching Trademark Laws to Protect Product Design and Packaging." Rep. Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, n.d. Web. 31 Oct. 2012. <http://www.brinkshofer.com/files/article_landslide_janfeb_2012_handelman.pdf>.
Harper, Michael. "Apple Adds New Complaints Against Samsung In Separate, Utility Patent Suit." Apple Gunning For Samsung's Galaxy S III And Galaxy Note. RedOrbit.com, 3 Sept. 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.redorbit.com /news/technology/1112686171/apple-patent-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-and-galaxy-note-090312>.
Heisler, Yoni. "The IPhone Patent Steve Jobs Particularly Cared about - Inertial Scrolling." Network World. Network World, Inc., 07 Aug. 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/iphone-patent-steve-jobs-particularly-cared-about-intertial-scrolling>.
Hotelling, Steven P., Joshua Strickon, and Brian Q. Huppi. Multipoint Touchscreen. Hotelling , Et Al., assignee. Patent 7663607. 28 Feb. 2012. Print.<http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=16&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&S1=(20120228.PD.+AND+Apple.ASNM.)&OS=ISD/20120228+AND+AN/Apple&RS=(ISD/20120228+AND+AN/Apple)>
Ingraham, Nathan. "UK Judge Says Galaxy Tab Does Not Infringe on the IPad, Design 'not As cool'" The Verge. N.p., 9 July 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/9/3146434/uk-galaxy-tab-ipad-infringement-ruling/in/2297513>.
Joseph, Parish. "Apple vs. Samsung: The Complete Lawsuit Timeline." The Verge. Vox Media, 2 Nov. 2011. Web. 01 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/apple/2011/11/2/2533472/apple-vs-samsung>.
Leisten, Karen. "Protecting a Company's Graphical User Interface." WilmerHale. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 6 May 2002. Web. 1 Nov. 2012. <http://www.wilmerhale.com/publications/whPubsDetail.aspx?publication=878>.
Lowe, Scott. "Samsung Awarded No Damages in Apple Patent counter-suit." The Verge. Vox Media, Inc., 24 Aug. 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/24/3266547/samsung-awarded-no-damages-apple-patent-dispute>.
Madrigal, Alexis C. "What Apple's Legal Win Over Samsung Means for You, Technology, Design, and the World." The Atlantic. N.p., 27 Aug. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/08/what-apples-legal-win-over- samsung-means-for-you-technology-design-and-the-world/261620/>.
Matas, Michael. Christie, Greg. Marcos, Paul D. Forstall, Scott. Van Os, Marcel. Ording, Bas. Chaudhri, Imran. "Portable electronic device for photo management" Patent 8,106,856. 31 Jan 2012.<http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=12&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,469,381&OS=7,469,381&RS=7,469,381>
Miller, James R., Thomas Benura, Bonnie Nardi, and David Wright. "System and Method for Performing an Action on a Structure in Computer-generated Data". Apple Computer, Inc. (Cupertino, CA), assignee. Patent 5,946,647. 31 Apr. 1999. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=5,946,647.PN.&OS=PN/5,946,647&RS=PN/5,946,647>
Mischler, Christopher J. "Apple vs. Samsung: A Visual Guide to Apple’s IP Claims: Hardware, Icons & Packaging." Technology & Graphics. Christopher J. Mischler, 3 May 2011. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. <http://peanutbuttereggdirt.com/e/2011/05/03/apple- vs-samsung-a-visual-guide-to-apples-ip-claims-hardware-icons-packaging/>.
Moore, Bradford Allan and Shaffer, Joshua. "Event Recognition." Patent 8,285,499. October 9, 2012. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=2&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&p=1&S1=7,844,915&OS=+7,844,915&RS=7,844,915>
No. C-89-4428-VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. 10 Apr. 1990.Google Scholar. Google Inc., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3538913398421433687&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholar>
Ording, Bas. "List scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display." Patent 7469381. 23 December 2008.
<http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7469381.PN.&OS=PN/7469381&RS=PN/7469381>
Ording, Bas. Forstall, Scott. Christie, Greg. Lemay, Stephen O. Chaudhri, Imran. Williamson, Richard. Blumeberg, Chris. Van Os, Marcel. "Portable Electronic Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Displaying Structured Electronic Documents. " Patent 7864163. 4 Jan 2011. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7864163.PN.&OS=PN/7864163&RS=PN/7864163>
Patel, Nilay. "Apple Sues Samsung: A Complete Lawsuit Analysis." The Verge. Vox Media, Inc., 19 Apr. 2011. Web. 09 October 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/04/19/apple-sues-samsung-analysis/>.
Patel, Nilay. "Apple Wins Preliminary Design-related Injunction against Samsung in Germany, Galaxy Tab 10.1 Sales Halted in EU (update: Samsung responds)." The Verge. N.p., 9 Aug. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/08 /09/apple-wins-preliminary-design-related-injunction-samsung-germany-galaxy-tab-10-1-sales-halted-eu//in/2297513>.
Patel, Nilay. "Dutch Court Grants Apple Preliminary Injunction against Sales of Samsung Galaxy smartphones." The Verge. N.p., 24 Aug. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/8/24/2381609/apple-samsung-dutch-injunction /in/2297513>.
Patel, Nilay. "The Myth of Pinch-to-zoom: How a Confused Media Gave Apple Something It Doesn't own." The Verge. Vox Media, Inc., 30 Aug. 2012. Web. 07 Oct. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/30/3279628/apple-pinch-to-zoom-patent- myth>.
Platzer, Andrew. and Herz, Scott. "Application programming interfaces of scrolling operations." Patent 7844915. 30 November 2010. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,844,915.PN.&OS=PN/7,844,915&RS=PN/7,844,915>
Reisinger, Don. "USPTO Nixes Apple Patent Used in Victory over Samsung." CNET News. CBS Interactive, 23 Oct. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57537912-37/uspto-nixes-apple-patent-used-in-victory-over-samsung/>.
Ricker, Thomas. "Apple Wins Injunction Halting Galaxy Tab 10.1 Sales In Australia." The Verge. N.p., 13 Oct. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/10/13/2487233/apple-wins-injunction-halting-galaxy-tab-10-1-sales-in-australia /in/2297513>.
Toor, Amar. "The Verge." The Verge. N.p., 22 Sept. 2012. Web. 07 Dec. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/24/3180781/apple-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1n-7-7-injunction-dusseldorf-germany>
"United States Code Title 35 - Patents." The United States Patent and Trademark Office. N.p., Aug. 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2012. <http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/consolidated_laws.pdf>
Wall, Michael. “Apple Vs. Samsung: Case Overview for the Patent Trial of the Century.” Brighthand. TechTarget. 28 July 2012. Web. 9 October 2012. <http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=19124&news=samsung+apple+lawsuit+case>
WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. SAMARA BROTHERS, INC. Supreme Court of the United States. 22 Mar. 2000. WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. SAMARA BROTHERS, INC. Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct /html/99-150.ZO.html>.
Wingfield, Nick. “In Apple’s Patent case, Tech Shifts May Follow.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 19 August 2012. Web. 6 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/technology/samsung-and-apple-fail-to-agree-out-of-court.html>
Wingfield, Nick. “Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 24 August 2012. Web. 6 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-patent-trial.html>
Wingfield, Nick. “Apple Case Muddies the Future of Innovations.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 26 August 2012. Web. 9 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/technology/apple-samsung-case-muddies-future-of-innovation.html>
Ante, Spencer E. “After Verdict, Prepare for the ‘Apple Tax’” The Wall Street Journal. N.p. 24 August. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444270404577610013613551038.html>
Apple Inc. United States. Registration No. 3,457,218. Filed 12 October 2007.
<http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77303049&docId=ORC20080729005406>
Apple Inc. United States. Registration No. 3,470,983. Filed 12 October 2007.
<http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77303282&docId=ORC20080722005613>.
Apple Inc. United States. Registration No. 3,475,327. Filed 12 October 2007.
<http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77303256&docId=ORC20080701005034>.
APPLE COMPUTER, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. APPLE COMPUTER, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, and Hewlett-Packard Co., Defendant-Appellant. APPLE COMPUTER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; Hewlett-Packard Co., a California Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. 35 The Federal Reporter 1435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. N.d.Bulk.Resource.org. Web. 08 Oct. 2012.
<http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/35/35.F3d.1435.93-16883.93-16869.93-16867.html>.
Apple Inc., a California corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a Korean corporation; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York corporation; and Samsung Telecommunications America, Llc, a Delaware limited liability company. 12-CV- 00630-LHK. United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division. Filed 1 July 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2012. <http://osterbergblog.typepad.com/files/apple-samsungpivgalaxy-nexus.pdf>.
Apple Inc., a California corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a Korean corporation; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York corporation; and Samsung Telecommunications America, Llc, a Delaware limited liability company. 12-CV- 00630-LHK. United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division. Filed 31 August 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2012. <http://www.scribd.com/doc/104573859/Amended-Galaxy-Complaint>.
Arrouye, Yan, and Keith Mortensen. "Universal Interface for Retrieval of Information in a Computer System". Apple Inc. (Cupertino, CA), assignee. Patent 8,086,604. 27 Dec. 2011. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=8,086,604.PN.&OS=PN/8,086,604&RS=PN/8,086,604>
Arthur, Charles, and George Sandeman. "Samsung: Verdict Is 'loss for American Consumer'" CNET News. CBS Interactive, 23 Aug. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500261-37/samsung-verdict-is-loss-for-american- consumer/>.
Bartz, Diane, and Dan Levine. "U.S. Court Clears Samsung Phone, Hands Apple Setback."Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/11/us-apple-samsung-patent-idUSBRE89A11C20121011>.
Blagdon, Jeff. "The Verge." The Verge. N.p., 24 July 2012. Web. 07 Dec. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/24/3180781/apple-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1n-7-7-injunction-dusseldorf-germany>
Chartrand, Sabra. “At the Patent Office, a Digital Dawn.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 12 November 1994. Web. 6 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/12/business/at-the-patent-office-a-digital-dawn.html>
Chartrand, Sabra. “PATENTS; The patent office is fighting once again to hold onto its own revenue in the budget battle.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 19 June 2000. Web. 10 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2000/06 /19/business/patents-patent-office-fighting-once-again-hold-onto-its-own-revenue-budget.html>
"Copyright vs. Trademark vs. Patent." Copyright vs. Trademark vs. Patent. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2012. <http://www.lawmart.com/forms/difference.htm>.
Davis, Shauna. Bickel, Ryan. "Display Screen with User Interface" Patent D640275. June 21 2011. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPT
O%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=11&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&p=1&S1=7,864,163&OS=7,864,163&RS=7,864,163>
Davidson, Phillip L. Graphical User Interface for Large-scale, Multi-user, Multi-touch Systems. Perceptive Pixel, Inc., assignee. Patent 8,181,122. 15 May 2012. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=8,181,122.PN.&OS=PN/8,181,122&RS=PN/8,181,122>
De La Merced, Michael J. “Yahoo and Facebook Settle Patent Lawsuits.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 6 July 2012. Web. 11 October 2012. <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/yahoo-and-facebook-said-to-settle-patent- lawsuits/>
Diaconescu, Adrian. "USPTO Invalidates Key Apple Patent, Samsung’s Defense Starts to Make Sense." Android Authority. N.p., 23 Oct. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.androidauthority.com/uspto-invalidates-key-apple-patent-samsung- war-125122/>.
Duhigg, Charles & Lohr, Steve. “The Patent, Used as a Sword.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 7 October 2012. Web. 9 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/technology/patent-wars-among-tech-giants-can-stifle-competition.html>
Etherington, Darrell. "U.S. Patent Office Preliminary Determination Finds That The âSteve Jobsâ Multitouch Patent Is Invalid." TechCrunch RSS. Aol Tech., 7 Dec. 2012. Web. 07 Dec. 2012.<http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/07/u-s-patent-office-preliminary-determination-finds-that-the-steve-jobs-multitouch-patent-is-invalid/>
Etherington, Darrell. "Apple Adds Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Mini And Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 To California Patent Lawsuit." TechCrunch. Aol Tech., 26 Nov. 2012. Web. 03 Dec. 2012. <http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/26/apple-adds-galaxy-note-ii-galaxy-s-iii-mini-and-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-to-california-patent-lawsuit/>
Etherington, Darrell. "Samsung Adds IPad Mini, 4th Generation IPad And 5th Generation IPod Touch To Patent Lawsuit." TechCrunch. AOL Tech, 22 Nov. 2012. Web. 03 Dec. 2012.<http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/22/samsung-adds-ipad-mini-4th-generation-ipad-and-5th-generation-ipod-touch-to-patent-lawsuit/>
Fisher, Lawrence M. “Software Industry in Uproar Over Recent Rush of Patents.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 12 May 1989. Web. 6 October 2012.<http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/12/business/software-industry-in-uproar-over-recent-rush-of-patents.html>
Freedman, Gordon J. "Asynchronous Data Synchronization amongst Devices." Apple Inc. (Cupertino, CA), assignee. Patent 7,761,414. 20 July 2010. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,761,414.PN.&OS=PN/7,761,414&RS=PN/7,761,414>
Gallagher, Billy. "Apple Awarded $1.049 Billion In Damages As Jury Finds Samsung Infringed On Design And Software Patents." TechCrunch. AOL Tech., 24 Aug. 2012. Web. 11 Oct. 2012. <http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/24/apple-wins-patent- ruling-as-jury-finds-samsung-infringes/>.
"General Information Concerning Patents." General Information Concerning Patents. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Nov. 2012. <http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/general_info_concerning_patents.jsp>.
Goodwin, Richard. "The Complete Guide to Why Apple Is Sueing Samsung." Know Your Mobile. Dennis Publishing 2012, 7 Sept. 2011. Web. 1 Nov. 2012. <http://www.knowyourmobile.com/features/1045462 /the_complete_guide_to_why_apple_is_sueing_samsung.html>.
Handelman, Jeffery A. "Stretching Trademark Laws to Protect Product Design and Packaging." Rep. Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, n.d. Web. 31 Oct. 2012. <http://www.brinkshofer.com/files/article_landslide_janfeb_2012_handelman.pdf>.
Harper, Michael. "Apple Adds New Complaints Against Samsung In Separate, Utility Patent Suit." Apple Gunning For Samsung's Galaxy S III And Galaxy Note. RedOrbit.com, 3 Sept. 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.redorbit.com /news/technology/1112686171/apple-patent-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-and-galaxy-note-090312>.
Heisler, Yoni. "The IPhone Patent Steve Jobs Particularly Cared about - Inertial Scrolling." Network World. Network World, Inc., 07 Aug. 2012. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/iphone-patent-steve-jobs-particularly-cared-about-intertial-scrolling>.
Hotelling, Steven P., Joshua Strickon, and Brian Q. Huppi. Multipoint Touchscreen. Hotelling , Et Al., assignee. Patent 7663607. 28 Feb. 2012. Print.<http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=16&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&S1=(20120228.PD.+AND+Apple.ASNM.)&OS=ISD/20120228+AND+AN/Apple&RS=(ISD/20120228+AND+AN/Apple)>
Ingraham, Nathan. "UK Judge Says Galaxy Tab Does Not Infringe on the IPad, Design 'not As cool'" The Verge. N.p., 9 July 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/9/3146434/uk-galaxy-tab-ipad-infringement-ruling/in/2297513>.
Joseph, Parish. "Apple vs. Samsung: The Complete Lawsuit Timeline." The Verge. Vox Media, 2 Nov. 2011. Web. 01 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/apple/2011/11/2/2533472/apple-vs-samsung>.
Leisten, Karen. "Protecting a Company's Graphical User Interface." WilmerHale. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 6 May 2002. Web. 1 Nov. 2012. <http://www.wilmerhale.com/publications/whPubsDetail.aspx?publication=878>.
Lowe, Scott. "Samsung Awarded No Damages in Apple Patent counter-suit." The Verge. Vox Media, Inc., 24 Aug. 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/24/3266547/samsung-awarded-no-damages-apple-patent-dispute>.
Madrigal, Alexis C. "What Apple's Legal Win Over Samsung Means for You, Technology, Design, and the World." The Atlantic. N.p., 27 Aug. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/08/what-apples-legal-win-over- samsung-means-for-you-technology-design-and-the-world/261620/>.
Matas, Michael. Christie, Greg. Marcos, Paul D. Forstall, Scott. Van Os, Marcel. Ording, Bas. Chaudhri, Imran. "Portable electronic device for photo management" Patent 8,106,856. 31 Jan 2012.<http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=12&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,469,381&OS=7,469,381&RS=7,469,381>
Miller, James R., Thomas Benura, Bonnie Nardi, and David Wright. "System and Method for Performing an Action on a Structure in Computer-generated Data". Apple Computer, Inc. (Cupertino, CA), assignee. Patent 5,946,647. 31 Apr. 1999. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=5,946,647.PN.&OS=PN/5,946,647&RS=PN/5,946,647>
Mischler, Christopher J. "Apple vs. Samsung: A Visual Guide to Apple’s IP Claims: Hardware, Icons & Packaging." Technology & Graphics. Christopher J. Mischler, 3 May 2011. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. <http://peanutbuttereggdirt.com/e/2011/05/03/apple- vs-samsung-a-visual-guide-to-apples-ip-claims-hardware-icons-packaging/>.
Moore, Bradford Allan and Shaffer, Joshua. "Event Recognition." Patent 8,285,499. October 9, 2012. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=2&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&p=1&p=1&S1=7,844,915&OS=+7,844,915&RS=7,844,915>
No. C-89-4428-VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. 10 Apr. 1990.Google Scholar. Google Inc., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. <http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3538913398421433687&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholar>
Ording, Bas. "List scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display." Patent 7469381. 23 December 2008.
<http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7469381.PN.&OS=PN/7469381&RS=PN/7469381>
Ording, Bas. Forstall, Scott. Christie, Greg. Lemay, Stephen O. Chaudhri, Imran. Williamson, Richard. Blumeberg, Chris. Van Os, Marcel. "Portable Electronic Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Displaying Structured Electronic Documents. " Patent 7864163. 4 Jan 2011. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7864163.PN.&OS=PN/7864163&RS=PN/7864163>
Patel, Nilay. "Apple Sues Samsung: A Complete Lawsuit Analysis." The Verge. Vox Media, Inc., 19 Apr. 2011. Web. 09 October 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/04/19/apple-sues-samsung-analysis/>.
Patel, Nilay. "Apple Wins Preliminary Design-related Injunction against Samsung in Germany, Galaxy Tab 10.1 Sales Halted in EU (update: Samsung responds)." The Verge. N.p., 9 Aug. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/08 /09/apple-wins-preliminary-design-related-injunction-samsung-germany-galaxy-tab-10-1-sales-halted-eu//in/2297513>.
Patel, Nilay. "Dutch Court Grants Apple Preliminary Injunction against Sales of Samsung Galaxy smartphones." The Verge. N.p., 24 Aug. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/8/24/2381609/apple-samsung-dutch-injunction /in/2297513>.
Patel, Nilay. "The Myth of Pinch-to-zoom: How a Confused Media Gave Apple Something It Doesn't own." The Verge. Vox Media, Inc., 30 Aug. 2012. Web. 07 Oct. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/30/3279628/apple-pinch-to-zoom-patent- myth>.
Platzer, Andrew. and Herz, Scott. "Application programming interfaces of scrolling operations." Patent 7844915. 30 November 2010. <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,844,915.PN.&OS=PN/7,844,915&RS=PN/7,844,915>
Reisinger, Don. "USPTO Nixes Apple Patent Used in Victory over Samsung." CNET News. CBS Interactive, 23 Oct. 2012. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57537912-37/uspto-nixes-apple-patent-used-in-victory-over-samsung/>.
Ricker, Thomas. "Apple Wins Injunction Halting Galaxy Tab 10.1 Sales In Australia." The Verge. N.p., 13 Oct. 2011. Web. 05 Nov. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2011/10/13/2487233/apple-wins-injunction-halting-galaxy-tab-10-1-sales-in-australia /in/2297513>.
Toor, Amar. "The Verge." The Verge. N.p., 22 Sept. 2012. Web. 07 Dec. 2012. <http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/24/3180781/apple-samsung-galaxy-tab-10-1n-7-7-injunction-dusseldorf-germany>
"United States Code Title 35 - Patents." The United States Patent and Trademark Office. N.p., Aug. 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2012. <http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/consolidated_laws.pdf>
Wall, Michael. “Apple Vs. Samsung: Case Overview for the Patent Trial of the Century.” Brighthand. TechTarget. 28 July 2012. Web. 9 October 2012. <http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=19124&news=samsung+apple+lawsuit+case>
WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. SAMARA BROTHERS, INC. Supreme Court of the United States. 22 Mar. 2000. WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. SAMARA BROTHERS, INC. Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct /html/99-150.ZO.html>.
Wingfield, Nick. “In Apple’s Patent case, Tech Shifts May Follow.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 19 August 2012. Web. 6 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/technology/samsung-and-apple-fail-to-agree-out-of-court.html>
Wingfield, Nick. “Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 24 August 2012. Web. 6 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-patent-trial.html>
Wingfield, Nick. “Apple Case Muddies the Future of Innovations.” New York Times. The New York Times Company. 26 August 2012. Web. 9 October 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/technology/apple-samsung-case-muddies-future-of-innovation.html>